Ragsdale Surname DNA Project
Another genealogical /
family history endeavor of Michael Ragsdale
Record of Updates, re: the Ragsdale Surname
DNA Project
|
3
June 2008
I have received another update from
a scientific perspective from Dr.
Joseph Lambert, our resident "DNA
guru."
________________________
The situation has not changed a
lot since I wrote 15 months ago,
although we have more data that
confirm those conclusions. As of
June 1, 2008, there are 13
participants, two of whom are
statistical outliers. Participant
103934 has the surname Morris but
was hoping to prove a Ragsdale
connection through adoption. His
DNA indicates that he is not of the
two major US Ragsdale lines.
Participant 60715 thought he might
be descended from the Godfrey line,
but his DNA is quite different from
the remaining participants. It is
unlikely that this person is related
to Godfrey.
Three participants (49632, 57688,
115696) have identical results for
37 markers, indicating a very close
relationship to each other. None
has a paper trail to Godfrey
Ragsdale, whereas in the larger
group described in the next
paragraph, one person does. It is
likely that these three represent
either a distinct Ragsdale line or
the result of a nonpaternal event on
the Godfrey line. All three men
have paper trails to Tennessee.
They are likely all descended from
John Ragsdale, born ca. 1722,
Henrico Co., VA, who had many
descendants in NC and TN.
The remaining eight participants
appear to be related, according to
their DNA results. Participant
49658 has a documented trail to
Godfrey Ragsdale. Six of these
participants match 12/12, a seventh
matches 11/12, and the eighth
matches 10/12. Normally, a 10/12
match is NOT considered good enough
for demonstrating a close
relationship. I include him here
tentatively. He definitely needs to
upgrade to 25 markers, as he cannot
rely on his current results at all.
Of the remaining seven, two match
25/25 and are considered to have the
original haplotype (H1) of Godfrey,
although this conclusion is
tentative. We can track the
mutations of all the other members
of this group of eight in the
fashion illustrated on the
attachment. This diagram is not
unique, as other valid ones can be
drawn. By way of example, the
original haplotype H1 suffers a
single mutation at site 391 to give
haplotype H2 for participant 49658.
A second mutation at site 439 then
gave haplotype H4 for participant
82408. On another line from
Godfrey, a mutation occurred at site
576. In later generations different
mutations occurred on two lines, one
at 456 to produce haplotype H4 for
participant 56964 and another at 449
to produce H7 for participant
100188. Three mutations occurred
somewhere along two other lines from
Godfrey to produce the distinct
haplotypes H5 for 82433 and H6 for
N60266.
We still have made no connections to
any English Ragsdales, but there
should be plenty of opportunities.
A good indication of our source can
be obtained from the surname
distribution search with The
National Trust in England. A search
of the 1881 census indicates that
the highest densities of Ragsdales
at that time was in the county of
Nottingham, with lower
concentrations in three surrounding
counties such as Doncaster. In
1998, Nottingham still had the
highest concentrations in England.
In addition to its surrounding
counties, there were concentrations
of Ragsdales in Truro (extreme
southwest), Canterbury (extreme
southeast), Ipswich, and Chester. A
few Ragsdales were found in greater
London in the Scottish county of
Perth. Thus we need to publicize
our project somehow in
Notthinghamshire, and maybe we can
find some relatives.
Joseph B. Lambert
Department of Chemistry
2145 Sheridan Road
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208-3113
Telephone: 1-847-491-5437
Fax: 1-847-491-7713
http://chemgroups.northwestern.edu/lambert/
|
|
12 May 2008
Complete 37-marker data is back for
our two newest "tested" members
(David G. & David O.), so Dr.
Lambert .... IT'S YOUR TURN :-)
Also I am please to announce that I
just today placed a kit order for
our newest member, who traces his
line back to Godfrey. Stay tuned
over the next month or so as his
data begins to appear.
Now ... time for a commercial:
The Ragsdale Surname DNA Project
General Fund is in place to help
offset the cost of testing for
members who need to avail themselves
of this money. As of late, we have
used portions of the General Fund on
the last three members and, sadly,
as of today, WE ARE BROKE. If you
can only give $10.00, it will be
greatly appreciated .... you never
know ... the one who can't afford
the testing just might be the one
that has the information you have
been searching so long and so hard
for.
To donate to the general fund,
simply go to this URL:
http://www.familytreedna.com/contribution.html
If paying by credit card/paypal, you
simply fill in Ragsdale as the DNA
project fund you are contributing to
(there is only one Ragsdale Surname
DNA Project at FamilyTreeDNA.com);
if paying by check (or just not
comfortable with sending credit card
information over the internet),
there is a simple form you can print
out, fill out, and mail in.
Not to put a guilt trip on anyone (
*grin* ) but I donated my $10.00
tonight twice .... with over 100
people subscribed to this mailing
list,if everyone would just give
$10.00 we would be sitting pretty
for a while ....
Thanks!
Michael |
|
27 April 2008
I have uploaded the pedigree of our
newest participant, David Ragsdale
(participant # 115696), to the site:
http://ragsdalefamily.org/dna/DavidRagsdale.pdf
Michael |
|
12 April 2008
Final 37-marker results are in for
participant 115696 and I am
extremely pleased to have found a
new "cousin" for myself and James
Howard Ragsdale, who up until now
had been languishing by ourselves in
the "Jordan & William Ragsdale
Group" (and we already knew we were
related so really had not learned
much until now). Looks like our
Jordan and William Ragsdale had a
brother named John Adams Ragsdale
... can't wait to learn more about
this part of my family.
Also, the 25-marker results have
been released on participant N60266
and it looks as though he is still
tracking with what we refer to as
the "Godfrey Group" ... his
remaining 12 marker should be
released soon.
Here is a link to the breakdown in
chart form:
http://ragsdalefamily.org/12_april_2008_dna_project.htm
Your humble and obedient servant,
Michael |
|
4 April 2008
Our two newest members, Mr. David
Glen Ragsdale and Dave Ragsdale have
had their 12-marker results
released.
Although it is much too early to
draw any conclusions, David Glen
Ragsdale is tracking 12-for-12 with
James Spencer Ragsdale, Henry E
Ragsdale, Richard E Ragsdale, Carl
Randall Ragsdale and Leonard Clinton
Ragsdale, and 11-for-12 with Robert
Frederick Ragsdale and Dave Ragsdale
is tracking 12-for-12 with James
Howard Ragsdale and Michael Wayne
Ragsdale (yours truly)
Again ... it's early, and neither of
these may stand the test of time (or
at least the test of the remaining
25 markers).
FTDNA estimates the final markers
will be released by the end of
April, so stay tuned.
Also, for those that have
noticed.... I have been having
issues with the website as of late
... sometimes it's there and
sometimes it's not. I have addressed
it by totally deleting the site and
re-installing it. Also, rather than
continuing to host a separate server
account for Ragsdale-DNA.org, all
the files and data have been moved
to RagsdaleFamily.org
(Ragsdale-DNA.org has been
disabled).
Michael Ragsdale |
|
25 August
2007
Hey Cousins!
I would like to take this
opportunity to introduce you to a
new "cousin" ..... and a very
welcomed new participant to the
Ragsdale Surname DNA Project.
Participant (Kit #) 100188 is
Spencer Ragsdale. We are so very
glad to have Spencer "on board" and
look forward to seeing his data
Rather than me go on and on, I'll
just let Spencer Ragsdale introduce
himself:
I think I am a direct descendent of
Peter Godfrey Ragsdale, based on
information from family members (who
are now long dead) and the book
"Elijah Ragsdale" by June Hart
Wester and Mrs. Blake Ragsdale Van
Leer.
I am certain that my Georgia line
goes back to Mason Ragsdale, one of
the eight brothers who split up in
Honea Path, South Carolina about
1828 and scattered to various parts
of Georgia. Using the Wester-Van
Lear data, the line goes from Mason
all the way back to Peter Godfrey
Ragsdale, the child who survived the
Indian massacre in Virginia. But I
have no other documentation of this
line. At various times I have tried
to go further back, but have hit a
blank wall. |
26 March
2007
Hi there one
and all.
We have received the 12-marker
y-DNA data on participant
#82408, who traces to a William
S. Ragsdale, c. 1890, North
Carolina.
|
|
9 March 2007
Hi there one and
all.
We have received the 37-marker y-DNA
data on participant #82433, and it
looks like we are continuing to
further define/redefine the Godfrey
Ragsdale y-DNA fingerprint. I will
get the data transferred to the
graphs/pages
on the
Ragsdale-DNA.org website
as soon
as I can, and I excitedly await Dr.
Lambert's take on this new data.
Michael
_________________________________________________________
37 Marker Analysis
Kit, Name, Distance (number of
mismatches)
54757, Hiram Ragsdale, 3
56964, Godfrey Ragsdale, 3
72061, Godfrey Ragsdale, 4
49658, David Alexander B. Ragsdale,
5
49632, Jordan Ragsdale, 17
57688, William Ragsdale, 17
60715, Godfrey Ragsdale, 20
from Dr.
Lambert:
OK, here goes. We
now know for sure the haplotype of
Godfrey Ragsdale, even though we
have seven different haplotypes out
of eight analyses. We have to go
with the largest group, and that
contains five people. Your group,
49632 and 57688, has four
differences in the first 12 markers
from the Group of Five, and your
group and the Group of Five are both
four different from 60715. For
haplogroup R1b1, these are huge
differences, indicating very distant
common ancestors. The fact that you
and 57688 have a 37 marker match
means that there is a definite
second Ragsdale line, but not from
Godfrey.
We can easily see the Godfrey
haplotype by looking at the first
five lines in the results table.
Godfrey's DYS numbers are either
five out of five (the same for all
members of the group) or four out of
five (differing by a single mutation
for only one member).
Traditionally, the progenitor's
haplotype is called H1. We have
three other haplotypes on this line,
which I am calling H2, H3, and H4,
just in the order they were
analyzed. 49658 (H2) had a mutation
at 391; 56964 (H3) had two
mutations, at 456 and 576; and the
new 82433 (H4) had three mutations,
at 438, 570, and CDYb. Most of
these mutations are in the faster
moving markers found in the 26-37
test, so two or three such mutations
are not unusual for a line from the
1600s. Those percentages you quoted
assumed that every marker mutates
with an equal rate, but this is not
the case at all. To take into
account the exact rate of mutation
for each one would be the accurate
thing to do, but impractical.
I have drawn a chart, which I attach
as a Word file, which shows Godfrey
at the top as H1 and the other three
haplotypes as divergent lines. None
of these other three haplotypes can
come from each other, as they have
no common mutations. I do not know
if attachments survive the Rootsweb
filters. If not, just email me
directly if you want a copy. I plan
to update it as other analyses come
through |
|
4 March 2007
Just wanted to update everyone ...
we currently have the DNA for two
new members being tested at the
FTDNA lab. One is for a 12-marker
y-DNA exam with no projected
completion date (probably late
March/early April time frame), and
the other is a 37-marker y-DNA exam
with a projected completion date of
mid-March. I will let you know as
soon as data has been released.
This will bring us to a total of
nine tested members, but we still
need MORE ... so start begging those
fathers, brothers, and uncles to
give up a little DNA in the name of
family history and genealogy
research.
Michael
|
|
15 January 2007
Added some
items to the main page, i.e., a
letter from Dr. Joseph Lambert
explaining the importance of DNA
testing as it pertains to Ragsdale
genealogical research. |
|
21
October
2006
We have
received the 25-marker analysis for
Participant 72601 which further
solidifies and confirms the Godfrey
Ragsdale lineage. More complete
reported will be posted when the
full 37-marker results are received
(around the 10 November 2006) |
|
2
June
2006
I haven't posted an update in
nearly a month, so here goes.
We have one participant whose
data should be released in the next
week or so (scheduled release date 9
June per FTDNA). As soon as this is
participant's data is available it
will be posted online.
We have another potential
participant who ordered his kit the
22nd of April but, as of yet, it has
not been returned to FTDNA.
Hopefully, we haven't lost this
potential participant.
We still are in need of other
participants, most especially those
who have not been able to connect to
the Godfrey Ragsdale line, so please
spread the word amongst your family
members.
More to come as it's available. |
|
6 May 2006
Exciting news (at least from my
standpoint). Up until this point in
time, I had been "odd man out" as it
pertains to having any degree of
match with other participants in the
project. This has changed!
Participant #57688 and myself
(#49632) have matched at 37 out of
37 loci.
So, the basic questions (at least
for my line) become:
- are we dealing with two
distinct Ragsdale lines, or,
- did all of the participants
have a common ancestor in the
past, and there was a
"non-paternal event" that has
confused the issue as it relates
to DNA?
We may never know for sure, but I
am hopeful that the answers will
come in time through the continued
hard work of all the Ragsdale
researchers. |
22April
2006
I just wanted
to let everyone know we have a
new participant as of last
evening. This gentleman,
participant #61629, goes back to
a Peter Ragsdale, born circa
1798 (probably in Virginia but
may have been North Carolina),
died circa 1860. He, like some
of the rest of us, has hit that
notorious brick wall and has
turned to genealogy by genetics
for some help.
This gives us
seven participants, with data
back on four (data should start
appearing on participant #57688
around the 1st week of May.
Unless something
comes up between now and then,
expect another update at this
time.
Michael Ragsdale
PS .....
Remember.... We still need
participants, so if you have not
already PLEASE give
consideration to joining the
project, or put a little
pressure on that brother or
cousin or uncle and get them to
join.
|
|
21
April 2006
I am very happy
to report that we have another
participant, #61629. This
participant traces his ancestry back
to a Peter Ragsdale, circa 1798 in
Virginia or North Carolina.
WELCOME ABOARD!
|
14 April 2006
The remaining markers were
released this evening on
participant #56964 and it
appears we are well on our way
to documenting the Godfrey
Ragsdale y-marker DNA. The
"Godfrey Group" now has three
participants and all three
analyze out at having a 99%+
chance of having a common
ancestor, and one of the
participants is our "gold
standard" as it applies to the
Godfrey Ragsdale line.
We
still have two kits in the
works, so it remains to be seen
whether we will continue adding
to the "Godfrey Group," add to
Line #2, or, perhaps, start a
whole new line.
I
know I am probably beginning to
sound like a broken record, but
PLEASE consider joining the
project and, if you can't,
PLEASE talk to your brother ,
cousin, uncle, and so on and
convince them to join in. To
make this meaningful for all
researchers, we need more males
from lines that have hit a brick
wall (these lines stand to gain
the most now that the Godfrey
line is being established).
|
|
13 April 2006
We are starting to receive data
(markers 1-12 and 26-37 have
been released) on
participant #56964. Very
preliminary analysis
demonstrates tracking with
participants #49658 & #54757 (as
expected), but we are unable to
run the Family Tree DNA Time
Predictor analysis on anything
more than 12-marker until the
remainder of the results are
released. The remainder of the
37-marker results will be posted
as they become available.
Data for participant #57688 is
estimated to be released around
the 5th of May, but don't be
surprised to see it a little
sooner than that, as FTDNA
historically gets results out
sooner than what they estimate
they will.
Also, we have a new participant,
kit #60715. It is still very
early in the process for him,
but we look forward to his
contribution to the project.
|
|
4 April 2006
Exciting news!
We
have received the data back for
participant #54757 and he is almost
a perfect match (-1 out of 37
markers) with participant #49658.
According to the
Family Tree DNA Time Predictor
Report, there is a 58.85%
probability they shared a common
ancestor within in the past 4
generations (and a 99.98%
probability within the past 24
generations).
Family Tree
DNA Time Predictor
Version 1.2 - Patent Pending
|
In comparing 37 markers,
the probability that
#49658 & #54757 shared a
common ancestor within
the last... |
|
4
generations is
58.85% |
8
generations is
88.95% |
12 generations
is
97.44% |
16 generations
is
99.45% |
20 generations
is
99.89% |
24 generations
is
99.98% |
I do
know for a fact that participant
#54757's researchers had hit that
notorious "brick wall" in their
research, so maybe this has knocked
a few bricks down for them....#54757,
meet your cousin #49658!
Hopefully, this will bring home the
fact to all of you that the DNA
project is a worthwhile endeavor,
and we are still in need of your
participation.
Spread the word that it does work
after all, and
join....join....join!!
Michael Ragsdale |
|
Participant #49920 has chosen to
remove himself from the Ragsdale
Surname DNA Project. He will
continue to monitor the project
from the sidelines while
continuing the search for his
family. I wish him the very best
in his endeavors.
We are now waiting results on
three participants (#54757,
#56964, and #57688). Results are
due in for participant #54757
around the 14th of April
(according to FTDNA).
Everyone stay tuned and
PLEASE don't loose
interest! We still are in need
of more participants, so if you
can't participate, get the word
out to your male relatives.
Also, don't forget the "general
fund." If testing would present
a financial burden, we have
money to help with the cost,
and, if you're able, donate $$$
to the general fund. This money
can/will only be used to help
defray the costs of DNA testing.
Michael Ragsdale
|
|
23 March 2006
We now have 25-marker data back
on participant #
49920 and my impression is there
is no match between either of
the previously returned
37-marker participants (based on
comparison of the same
25-markers).
Family Tree DNA Time
Predictor
Version 1.2 - Patent Pending
In comparing 25
markers, the
probability that
#49920 and #49658
shared a common
ancestor within the
last...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
March 2006
So far, we have five participants in
the project, and as of this writing,
37-marker analysis is complete and
has been posted for the first two
participants.
The latest participant to sign up
for testing is what I refer to
(lovingly, of course *S*) as a "Gold
Standard" Ragsdale, i.e., he has a
well documented pedigree from
Godfrey(1) through Elijah(5) through
Joseph(6) and so forth.
Participation in this project is
something that this individual had
no incentive to do with regards to
his personal genealogy. He knows his
family history and very little, if
anything, could possibly be gained
from participating in our project.
In actuality, he does stand to gain
something, though, in the knowledge
that he is going to help others who
are trying to document their own
family histories and/or break down
one of those brick walls we seem to
constantly be butting up against. I
cannot thank this man enough.
I would like to issue a challenge to
other documented "gold standard"
Ragsdale males (especially if you
belong to one of the lines formed by
Elijah's other sons) to also
participate in this project. If
money is an issue, we have the
"general fund" donations we can use
. . . in fact, if someone steps up
from one of Elijah's other lines, I
am offering to see that their
participation is fully funded.
You may ask what can we gain by
having two from the same basic line
participate? Well, the answer is
VALIDITY. By having two sets of
y-marker DNA analyzed "cousins" as
it were, it serves to add
credibility and validity to the
results, and that, after all, is
what we are all looking for.
If you know someone who fits this
description, but might not know of
what is happening with the DNA
Surname Project, PLEASE let them
know we need them.
Thanks for listening . . . and
thanks for participating.
There's an old saying that goes
something like this: "If you're
lucky enough to be Irish, you're
lucky enough." I think we can
truthfully change that to say " If
you're lucky enough to be a
Ragsdale, you're lucky enough."
Take care and God Bless . . .
Michael Ragsdale |
|
7
March 2006
Another update on our project.
We now have 37-marker y-DNA analysis
data on two individuals, and it is
looks like we "may" be
dealing with two distinct and
different Ragsdale paternal lines
(too earlier to tell for sure with
such limited participation).
Family Tree DNA Time Predictor
Version 1.2 - Patent Pending
In comparing 37
markers, the
probability that
#46985 and #46932
shared a common
ancestor within the
last...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
March 2006
Currently, there a four members of
the RAGSDALE Surname DNA Project.
Things are proceeding just about as
expected, although it would be very
nice to have one or two RAGSDALE
"gold standards" participate in the
project.
Member #46958 has 25 of 37 markers
reported (the remainder are expected
mid-March).
Member #49632 (yours truly) has 12
of 37 markers reported (the
remainder are expected mid-March).
Member #49920 has zero of 25 markers
reported (initial data expected
mid-to-late March).
Member #54757 has zero of 37 markers
reported (initial data expected
late-March to Mid-April).
So, things are happening, just
slower than most (or at least
myself) would like, but that's the
nature of the beast.
I would like to take his opportunity
to again encourage ALL RAGSDALE
males to participate in this
project. We have the opportunity to
possibly break down some brick walls
with this endeavor, and thus widen
the circle of RAGSDALE family
members, but we must have
participants to do this.
And remember, if you can't
participate directly, you can still
donate to the "general fund" to help
defray the expenses for someone who
may wish to participate and just
financially can't afford it
(currently there is $105.00 in the
fund).
As an addition to the project
through FTDNA, participants are
eligible to submit their data, at no
charge, to ysearch.org (the largest
worldwide
public Y-DNA database with the most
extensive number of markers which
exceeds 17,000 records (haplotypes)
and 170,000 ancestors names).
Plus, for $15.00, you can transfer
your 12-marker data to the National
Geographic's Genographic Project
(this enables you to print out a
nice Haplogroup Certificate, a
Haplogroup Migration Route Map, and
the Genetic History of your
Haplogroup (mine is R1B [M343]).
A lot to think about .... But please
do consider participating (or at the
least encouraging someone else to
participate).
Michael Ragsdale |
|
25
February 2006
I
wanted to let everyone know that
some initial DNA results have been
posted on our FTDNA website
(http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ragsdale/).
Partial results from two kits are in
so far (more to come since we both
ordered 37-marker upgrades).
No real surprises yet ... both are
R1B1 haplogroup (as I would have
expected).
Keep checking back as more data from
these two kits is posted, plus data
from the other two kits that have
yet to be analyzed arrives soon.
Michael
PS .... guess now it's time to get
the books out so I can figure out
what all these numbers really mean. |
|
15
February 2006
As
promised, here's another update on
the progress of the RAGSDALE Surname
DNA Project.
As of 15 February 206, we have 4
members (we picked up a new member
today). Many thanks to those of you
that have decided to join the
project, but I know there has to be
more RAGSDALE males (and families)
who stand to benefit if there were
greater participation..
According to the folks at FTDNA, we
should start seeing some DNA
analysis results posted sometime the
first two weeks of March (for the
first two kits that were returned),
so everyone keep checking back.
Also, if you can't (or don't need to
participate), help someone else by
contributing to the RAGSDALE Surname
DNA Project General Fund. We
currently have $65.00 in the fund,
but I Know for a fact that $20.00
more was contributed just today.
Remember, this money is used ONLY to
help someone who might have trouble
paying for their testing.
Michael Ragsdale |
|
7
February 2006
36
hrs later and we now have $65.00
available in the RAGSDALE Surname
DNA Project general fund to help if
needed.
Thanks to the contributors (you know
who you are) !!!!
Michael Ragsdale |
|
6
February 2006
We now have
three member kits that have been
received back at FTDNA. Hopefully we
will begin seeing some data before
too much longer.
Just a reminder ..... the Ragsdale
Surname DNA Project has a general
fund account (administered by
FTDNA). Money in this this fund will
ONLY be used to assist those
individuals who quite possibly might
not be able to afford the entire
cost of testing (as determined by
consultation between the
individual(s), myself and Chris
Ragsdale).
I added $20.00 to this fund today as
"seed money." If everyone on the
list could contribute a few dollars,
we could help a cousin or two join
in this effort that could very
benefit ALL Ragsdale researchers.
The link to make a donation is as
follows:
http://www.familytreedna.com/contribution.htm
Michael |
|
4
February 2006
As of this
date, we have three participants in
the project, two of whose kits have
been received back at FTDNA, and we
should start seeing data in another
few weeks.
As before, we need each of you help
get the word out to your family
members about this project. We MUST
have more participants for this
project to be able to give any kind
of meaningful data (and, most
especially, we need participants
from the "established" Ragsdale
lines, i.e., Godfrey Ragsdale,
Elijah Ragsdale, and so on).
Please consider participating in the
project or, if you are unable to do
so, please consider partially (or
fully) funding someone else's
membership. We ALL stand to gain
from the data gathered by this
undertaking.
Bottom line ... for this to work, we
are going to have to have more
participants, so PLEASE think about
this, talk it over with your kin,
and go here:
http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ragsdale/
to order your kit(s).
Michael Ragsdale |
|
22
January 2006
As promised,
an update on the Ragsdale Surname
DNA Project:
As of this date, we have only two
participants in the project (which
has been more than a little
disappointing to me), both of their
kits have been received back at
FTDNA, and we should start seeing
data in 4-6 weeks or so.
Interestingly, both these
participants (yes, I'm one of them)
have gone on and upgraded to the 37
marker Y-DNA test.
Please, I need each of you help get
the word out to your family members
about this project. We have to have
more participants for this project
to be able to give any kind of
meaningful data, and most especially
we need participants from the
"established" Ragsdale lines, i.e.,
Godfrey Ragsdale, Elijah Ragsdale,
and so on. The two participants we
presently have both hit "brick
walls" back in the early 1800's, so
we need other participants who can
help knock these walls down.
The test itself is painless so I
know that's not what is holding
participants back.
Is it the expense? If so, get with
your brothers, sisters, aunts,
uncles and cousins and so on, and
all of you share the cost to have a
couple of participants tested.
Bottom line ... for this to work, we
are going to have to have more
participants, so PLEASE think about
this, talk it over with your kin,
and go here:
http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ragsdale/
to order your kit(s).
Michael Ragsdale |
|
29
December 2005
Good morning
one and all.
We now have two RAGSDALE males who
have signed and have kits ordered,
but we most definitely need MORE (I
noticed there were two other
RAGSDALE males who had been tested
by FTDNA before the project began,
so maybe they will read this and
have FTDNA move their data to the
project).
As I tried to explain earlier, we
need males from as many lines as we
can identify but more important than
that, especially at the start, we
need males from what I refer to as
the "gold standard lines" (i.e., the
ones who can document their lineage
from Godfrey, Elijah, and so on).
There are bound to be RAGSDALE
descendants who, for one reason or
another will not be able to
participate, such as when there are
no longer any living males in their
line or possibly they just cannot
afford the cost of the testing. The
latter is where the RAGSDALE Surname
DNA Project General Fund comes in.
The general fund is setup through
FTDNA as a place where interested
and caring individuals can make
donations to help offset the cost of
testing for those in need (perhaps
you have no males in your family,
but you want to see the testing
proceed and succeed, or you are part
of a well established line and want
to help someone else with the cost
of testing). You can contribute any
amount you desire (it does not have
to be the cost of a test, it can be
$5.00 if that's what you'd like to
give). This money is placed in a
general fund accessible only by the
RAGSDALE surname DNA project
administrators and can ONLY be
applied to offset the fee when we
have a potential donor who just
can't afford the entire amount.
One thing to consider: Let's say you
had RAGSDALE "A" who had six sons,
and they each had six sons. All of
the six sons and thirty-six
grandsons DO NOT need to be tested.
It is my understanding if you test
one of the them, the results are
valid for the others. In this
situation, all the other cousins
could help pay for the one cousin to
be tested, or they could all make a
small contribution to the general
fund to help a "cousin" they
possibly haven't met yet.
Follow this link and you can see how
easy it is to make a contribution:
http://www.familytreedna.com/contribution.htm
Again, let me assure you that any
money contributed will go to the
RAGSDALE Surname DNA Project and
can/will be used only to help offset
the testing fees for those in need.
Michael Ragsdale
(michael.ragsdale@comcast.net)
Chris Ragsdale (CMRagsdale@aol.com) |
27 December 2005
I just
wanted to take this opportunity
to let everyone know the I/we
have taken the "scientific
plunge" (so to speak). We now
have a RAGSDALE Surname DNA
Project open at FamilyTreeDNA.
So far, I am the only member (my
12-marker test kit is "in the
mail") but I hope to recruit
many more RAGSDALE males soon.
If you, like myself, have been
considering this but were a
little put off by the price,
note that by becoming a member
of the Surname project, there is
a substantial savings on the
cost of the 12-marker DNA
analysis ($99.00 as opposed to
$159.00 for non-member testing),
so hopefully this will be enough
incentive for others to join and
relinquish some cheek cells.
I have asked Chris Ragsdale to
co-administer the project with
me and she has graciously
agreed.
The public website at
FamilyTreeDNA is:
http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ragsdale/
Also, there is more information
located on
http://www.ragsdalefamily.org
What we need most of all (while
in the start-up mode) is DNA
from well documented/confirmed
lineages, e.g., back to Godfrey
RAGSDALE and even further back
if possible. This will give us
the "gold standard" to compare
other DNA results to.
I am looking forward to finding
some new cousins!
Happy New Year!
Michael Ragsdale
|
|
|